Much hand wringing this weekend about the prez's so-called loss of white support,
the media's thrall of the angry super-pats, the perils the Dems face in the '10 elections. Even Mr. Rich was cranky yesterday about how in his opinion Obama allowed the healthcare debate to be hijacked by the flag necktie set, dah dah dah. . .
You may say I'm a dreamer, but let's look at things in a slightly different light. First: there is still no smart person in sight in GOP Land. Stupid people running things make colossal and avoidable errors, even when events might favor them, which they currently don't. Second: Newspapers and TV have
always sided with the forces of money and entrenched order, being forces of money and entrenched order themselves--that is until recently. Watching their influence and income drain every quarter, they have ramped up their coverage of the shrill and mindless because A) their bottom line inclines them to do so (count the ad pages and commercial minutes for prescription drugs and hospitals sometime) and B) the old media folk desperately need to prove they still drive the narrative, now that it's getting clearer that they really don't.
Just as Three: the GOP's legislative apparatus desperately needs to show its sponsors that it can still deliver, a proposition which has looked dubious all year and now, after the prez's address last Wednesday, verges on the laughable. No, the serious money people are looking on those loud-mouth sign-waving clowns (I am referring to elected Republican officials in the House chamber, not the good citizens assembled on the Mall) and must wonder deeply what their money is getting them now.
Nutty Jim DeMint is right, this really is Waterloo for the GOP--not because our freedoms as a nation have been sucked away by fascist czarist communists, but because those who hand out the serious green will look to spend their Washington money where it will get the best return, which will not be the coffers of the result-starved, brain-dead, helpless GOP.
In truth, big money moving back to the Democratic side is not such great news, but I will venture to say that big money ain't what it used to be and that the Dems do not line up in nearly as fine an order as the highly-trained Repubs. But that will have to be a story for another day.
Nate Silver advises not to minimize the import of a DC rally which drew at best estimate 70,000 souls, so I won't. But still, organizers would have certainly liked to have at least cracked the six-figure mark. Looked at from the perspective of audience share, it was a very poor showing indeed if what you wanted to demonstrate was the awesome power of right-wing radio and TV media.
Nope, the visuals were pretty pathetic (honestly, how many non-bottom-feeding advertisers will look upon the video and film of the sincere and strange people assembled in DC this weekend and say: Yes! There's my national market!), and as near as I can tell, no speaker or entertainer of any vividness or strength--a Huey Long, say, a Woody Guthrie--appeared to galvanize the attending and appeal to those watching from afar. No, the best the likes of FUX et. al. could accomplish was to get a bunch of decent, if very upset and confused, people to mix with some genuinely hateful low-lifes to reflect the pain and discord felt by most Americans anyway. Message being: Things are tough all over.
UPDATE: Like I was sayin' (even
a month ago--
this just in from Matty